From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Myers v. State

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma
Oct 29, 1927
38 Okla. Crim. 287 (Okla. Crim. App. 1927)

Summary

stating that "the word ‘where’ is broadly used in the sense of ‘in the case or in the instance in which’ ..."

Summary of this case from State v. Culver

Opinion

No. A-6323.

Opinion Filed October 29, 1927.

(Syllabus.)

Evidence — Evidence Procured on Illegal Search Warrant. Where a search warrant is issued upon an affidavit disclosing upon its face that it is made upon information and belief, it is invalid, and evidence procured by such invalid search warrant, upon timely objection, should be excluded.

Appeal from County Court, Oklahoma County; C.C. Christison, Judge.

Dave Myers and Mrs. Dave Myers were convicted of maintaining a place where intoxicating liquors were kept for the purpose of violating the prohibitory liquor law, and they appeal. Reversed and remanded.

Wright, Gill Ramsdale, for plaintiff in error.

Edwin Dabney, Atty. Gen., for the State.


The plaintiffs in error were convicted in the county court of Oklahoma county on a charge of maintaining a place where intoxicating liquors were kept for the purpose of violating the prohibitory liquor law, and were each sentenced to pay a fine of $50 and to serve 30 days in the county jail.

Before entering upon the trial plaintiffs in error filed a motion to suppress the evidence for the reason that it had been obtained by an unlawful search, which motion was overruled and exceptions saved. The record discloses that certain officers, in the nighttime, went to the private residence of plaintiffs in error and made a search of the premises and of the person of Mrs. Dave Myers, one of the plaintiffs in error, and found on her person a pint of whisky. The affidavit for a search warrant upon its face states that it is made upon information and belief. It is invalid and the warrant based upon it invalid, and the evidence procured by such invalid search warrant is incompetent. The motion to suppress should have been sustained.

The case is reversed and remanded.

DOYLE, P.J., concurring.

DAVENPORT, J., absent, not participating.


Summaries of

Myers v. State

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma
Oct 29, 1927
38 Okla. Crim. 287 (Okla. Crim. App. 1927)

stating that "the word ‘where’ is broadly used in the sense of ‘in the case or in the instance in which’ ..."

Summary of this case from State v. Culver
Case details for

Myers v. State

Case Details

Full title:DAVE MYERS et ux. v. STATE

Court:Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma

Date published: Oct 29, 1927

Citations

38 Okla. Crim. 287 (Okla. Crim. App. 1927)
260 P. 515

Citing Cases

State v. Culver

Webster’s Third New International Dictionary of the English Language Unabridged 2602 (1981); see alsoLaeroc…

Loveless v. State

The motion to suppress the evidence should have been sustained. Myers et ux. v. State, 38 Okla. Cr. 287, 260…