From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Myers v. Rude

Supreme Court of Colorado. En Banc. En Banc
Jan 13, 1931
299 P. 50 (Colo. 1931)

Opinion

No. 12,450.

Decided January 13, 1931. Rehearing denied May 18, 1931.

Receivership proceeding. Decree for sale of property.

Reversed.

1. RECEIVERS — Adjudicated Cases. All questions involved and considered in this case are settled in Rossi v. Colorado Pulp and Paper Co., 88 Colo. 461, and Sparling Coal Co. v. Colorado Pulp and Paper Co., 22 Colo. 523.

Error to the District Court of Adams County, Hon. Samuel W. Johnson, Judge.

Mr. ERNEST MORRIS, Mr. C. E. WAMPLER, for plaintiff in error.

Mr. JOHN S. STIDGER, Messrs. BLOUNT, SILVERSTEIN ROSNER, Messrs. VAN CISE ROBINSON, Mr. J. E. ROBINSON, Messrs. HUGHES DORSEY, Messrs. DAVIS WALLBANK, for defendants in error.

Messrs. HODGES, WILSON ROGERS, Mr. CLARENCE A. BRANDENBURG, Messrs. LEWIS GRANT, Mr. ROBERT L. STEARNS, Messrs. PERSHING, NYE, TALLMADGE BOSWORTH, Mr. LEWIS A. DICK, MR. FREDERICK P. CRANSTON Mr. CHAS. E. FRIEND, amici curiae.


THIS cause has been brought to this court by Charles B. Myers. It is a companion case to Myers v. Beck, 88 460 Colo. 457, 299 Pac. 50, Rossi v. Colorado Pulp and Paper Co., 88 Colo. 461, 299 Pac. 19, and Geo. N. Sparling Coal Co. v. Colorado Pulp and Paper Co., 88 Colo. 523, 299 Pac. 41, all of which have been consecutively prosecuted by separate writs of error, to review various orders and decrees contained in one suit in the district court of Adams county, numbered and entitled, "No. 2367, Charles B. Myers, plaintiff, v. Colorado Pulp and Paper Co. et al, defendants." We have consolidated the several cases for final determination.

The defendants in error under the present writ are Colorado Pulp and Paper Company, George W. Beck as receiver thereof, Intermountain Paper Stock Company, I. Rude, Max Bronstine, Aaron Bronstein, Joseph Buchhalter, Moses Buchhalter, Morris H. Block, Maurice H. Levy, Edward I. Levy, Harry C. Davis, Harry S. Silverstein, Wilbur F. Denious, Stanley T. Wallbank and International Trust Company.

For the reasons given in Rossi v. Colorado Pulp and Paper Co., and Sparling Coal Co. v. Colorado Pulp and Paper Co., supra, the judgment herein is reversed at the costs of plaintiff in error.

For reasons also there stated, we have directed that the costs in Rossi v. Colorado Pulp and Paper Co., and Geo. N. Sparling Coal Co. v. Colorado Pulp and Paper Co., supra, be assessed to Joseph Buchhalter, I. Rude, Aaron Bronstein and Max Bronstine, who are defendants in error in all of the cases named except Myers v. Beck, supra.

MR. JUSTICE BUTLER not participating.

On Rehearing.


OPINION modified and rehearing denied, in accordance with our decision on petitions for rehearing and modification in No. 12,590, George N. Sparling Coal Co. v. Colo. Pulp and Paper Co., 88 Colo. 523, 299 Pac. 41.


Summaries of

Myers v. Rude

Supreme Court of Colorado. En Banc. En Banc
Jan 13, 1931
299 P. 50 (Colo. 1931)
Case details for

Myers v. Rude

Case Details

Full title:MYERS v. RUDE ET AL

Court:Supreme Court of Colorado. En Banc. En Banc

Date published: Jan 13, 1931

Citations

299 P. 50 (Colo. 1931)
299 P. 50

Citing Cases

Sparling Co. v. Colorado Co.

The defendants in error herein are the Colorado Pulp and Paper Company, George W. Beck, as receiver thereof,…

Rossi v. Colorado Co.

This matter has been brought to this court on writ of error by William Rossi, a general creditor of the…