From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Myers v. Davis

United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, Winchester Division
Dec 4, 1978
467 F. Supp. 8 (E.D. Tenn. 1978)

Opinion

No. CIV-4-78-24.

December 4, 1978.

Jerre M. Hood, and Robert S. Peters, Winchester, Tenn., for plaintiff.

Joe R. Hickerson, and Ben P. Lynch, Winchester, Tenn., for defendants.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER


This is a civil action for money damages for the deprivation of the plaintiff's civil rights, 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 28 U.S.C. § 1343(3). The complaint alleges that, on an isolated occasion, the two individual defendants, as police officers for the city of Cowan, Tennessee and acting under color of Tennessee law, used an excessive and unreasonable amount of force upon him. The plaintiff contends that the defendant municipality "* * * is liable for the said acts of the officers by virtue of Tennessee Code Annotated § 6-640, upon which statute [the] plaintiff relies as [the] basis of the cause of action against the defendant, City of Cowan. * * *" This amounts to an attempt to hold the defendant municipality liable under the doctrine of respondeat superior. This cannot be done. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Soc. Serv. (1978), 436 U.S. 658, 691, 98 S.Ct. 2018, 2036, 56 L.Ed.2d 611, 636; Jones v. City of Memphis, C.A. 6th (1978), 586 F.2d 622, 623.

"* * * Whenever * * * any employee member of a * * * police department of a municipal corporation * * * shall be sued for damages arising out of the performance of his official duties and while engaged in the course of his employment by such governmental agency, such governmental agency shall be authorized and required * * * to indemnify him from any judgment rendered against him in such suit; provided, however, that such indemnity shall not extend to any judgment for punitive damages or for damages arising out of any willful wrongdoing by said employee and; provided, further, that such municipal corporation * * * shall have notice of such suit. * * *"

Accordingly, as to the defendant the City of Cowan, Tennessee, this action hereby is DISMISSED sua sponte for the failure of the plaintiff to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

"* * * Even if a party does not make a formal motion, the court on its own initiative may note the inadequacy of the complaint and dismiss it for failure to state a claim. * * *" 5 Wright Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure: Civil 593, § 1357.


Summaries of

Myers v. Davis

United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, Winchester Division
Dec 4, 1978
467 F. Supp. 8 (E.D. Tenn. 1978)
Case details for

Myers v. Davis

Case Details

Full title:Jimmy W. MYERS, Plaintiff, v. Larry B. DAVIS et al., etc., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, Winchester Division

Date published: Dec 4, 1978

Citations

467 F. Supp. 8 (E.D. Tenn. 1978)

Citing Cases

Metadure Corp. v. United States

Although the defendants have not specifically addressed Hassine's fourth cause of action, this court has…

Jenkins v. Carruth

Accordingly, his claim herein hereby is DISMISSED sua sponte for such reason. Myers v. Davis, D.C.Tenn.…