From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Muwwakkil v. Johnson

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jan 13, 2011
407 F. App'x 685 (4th Cir. 2011)

Opinion

No. 10-7373.

Submitted: December 16, 2010.

Decided: January 13, 2011.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, Chief District Judge. (7:09-cv-00318-gec-mfu).

Kamal S. Muwwakkil, Appellant Pro Se. Banci Enga Tewolde, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia; Jim H. Guynn, Jr., Guynn, Memmer Dillon, PC, Salem, Virginia, for Appellees.

Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Kamal S. Muwwakkil appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Muwwakkil v. Johnson, No. 7:09-cv-00318-gec-mfu, 2010 WL 3585983 (W.D.Va. Sept. 12, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Muwwakkil v. Johnson

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jan 13, 2011
407 F. App'x 685 (4th Cir. 2011)
Case details for

Muwwakkil v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:Kamal S. MUWWAKKIL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gene M. JOHNSON; Larry…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Jan 13, 2011

Citations

407 F. App'x 685 (4th Cir. 2011)

Citing Cases

Rogers v. N. Carolina Dep't of Pub. Safety

(footnote omitted), affd, 407 Fed.Appx. 685 (4th Cir.…

Humple v. Hilewitz

Concerning the plaintiff's claim for retaliation, the defendant's Memorandum of Law correctly asserts that…