From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Muvico Entertainment, L.L.C. v. Pointe Orlando Development Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Apr 14, 2000
755 So. 2d 194 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

No. 5D99-2641.

Opinion filed April 14, 2000.

Non-Final Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Rom W. Powell, Senior Judge.

Michael K. Wilson and Frank A. Hamner and G. Robertson Dilg of Gray, Harris Robinson, P.A., Orlando, for Appellant.

Stacy D. Blank and Jack C. McElroy of Holland Knight LLP, Tampa, for Appellees.

PETERSON and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.


We affirm the order rendered by the trial court requiring the appellant to deposit into the registry of the court rent that accrued as well as accrues during the pendency of the underlying action. We note, however, that subsection 83.232(2), Florida Statutes (1999), specifically provides that if the tenant contests the amount of money to be paid into the court registry, the court is limited to factual and legal issues concerning what constitutes rent under the lease agreement and whether the tenant is due any credits for rent that has been paid. Therefore, we make no determination concerning the trial court's interpretation of the abatement clause contained in the lease agreement entered into between the parties to this action since that is a matter to be resolved at trial and not in proceedings under section 83.232.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Muvico Entertainment, L.L.C. v. Pointe Orlando Development Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Apr 14, 2000
755 So. 2d 194 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

Muvico Entertainment, L.L.C. v. Pointe Orlando Development Co.

Case Details

Full title:MUVICO ENTERTAINMENT L.L.C., Appellant, v. POINTE ORLANDO DEVELOPMENT…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Apr 14, 2000

Citations

755 So. 2d 194 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Citing Cases

Invego Auto Parts v. Rodriguez

We find that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in requiring payments of rent into the registry…

Double Park, LLC v. Kaine Parking 125, LLC

Double Park balked, claiming that its rent obligation under the lease should not be increased because the…