From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mutzutz Sutuj v. Current or Acting Field Office Dir.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Mar 11, 2024
23-cv-05455-RMI (N.D. Cal. Mar. 11, 2024)

Opinion

23-cv-05455-RMI

03-11-2024

JORGE ADABERTO MUTZUTZ SUTUJ, Plaintiff, v. CURRENT OR ACTING FIELD OFFICE DIRECTOR, Defendant.


ORDER RE: MOTION TO DISMISS RE: DKT. NO. 9

ROBERT M. ILLMAN United States Magistrate Judge.

Petitioner filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (dkt. 1), through which he requested a bond hearing during the pendency of his immigration removal proceedings. Several weeks later, “Petitioner was legally removed from the United States to Guatemala and his removal from the United States was verified by a DHS official who witnessed the removal.” Resp.'s Mot. (dkt. 9) at 4. Deportation after filing a habeas petition does not always moot a petitioner's claim. See Abdala v. INS, 488 F.3d 1061, 1063-1064 (9th Cir. 2007). “For a habeas petition to continue to present a live controversy after the petitioner's release or deportation, however, there must be some remaining ‘collateral consequence' that may be redressed by success on the petition.” Id. (citing Spencer v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1, 7 (1998)). Because the Petition only sought a bail determination pending removal, the government's motion to dismiss the Petition as moot is GRANTED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Mutzutz Sutuj v. Current or Acting Field Office Dir.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Mar 11, 2024
23-cv-05455-RMI (N.D. Cal. Mar. 11, 2024)
Case details for

Mutzutz Sutuj v. Current or Acting Field Office Dir.

Case Details

Full title:JORGE ADABERTO MUTZUTZ SUTUJ, Plaintiff, v. CURRENT OR ACTING FIELD OFFICE…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Mar 11, 2024

Citations

23-cv-05455-RMI (N.D. Cal. Mar. 11, 2024)