From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Muttontown Realty Corp. v. Schwartz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 25, 1993
197 A.D.2d 680 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

October 25, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Segal, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The record raises triable issues of fact (see, CPLR 3212) as to whether the plaintiff waived timely performance on the part of the defendants (see, Ranfro Dev. Corp. v. Home Funding Co., 26 A.D.2d 955). Contrary to the plaintiff's contention, we also find that the defendants' actions on the day finally set for closing did not constitute an anticipatory breach of the parties' contract (see, Calamari Perillo, Contracts § 12-3, at 521 [3d ed]). Bracken, J.P., Balletta, Eiber, O'Brien and Santucci, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Muttontown Realty Corp. v. Schwartz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 25, 1993
197 A.D.2d 680 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

Muttontown Realty Corp. v. Schwartz

Case Details

Full title:MUTTONTOWN REALTY CORP., Appellant, v. RICHARD SCHWARTZ et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 25, 1993

Citations

197 A.D.2d 680 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
604 N.Y.S.2d 776

Citing Cases

Coney Island Exhaust v. Mobil Oil Corp.

In its third-party answer, Reaction Corp. asserted counterclaims, alleging, inter alia, that the stipulation…