From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mutch v. New Jersey Div. of Taxation

Tax Court of New Jersey
Feb 1, 1989
11 N.J. Tax 87 (Tax 1989)

Opinion

Argued January 19, 1989.

Decided February 1, 1989.

On appeal from the Tax Court of New Jersey.

Richard S. Hyland argued the cause for appellants ( Myers, Matteo, Rabil, Norcross Landgraf, attorneys; Mitchell J. Rabil, on the brief).

Jeanne E. Gorrissen, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent ( Cary Edwards, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney; Benjamin Clarke, Deputy Attorney General, of counsel; Jeanne E. Gorrissen, on the brief).

Before Judges GAULKIN and BILDER.


The opinion of the court was delivered by


The judgment of the Tax Court is affirmed substantially for the reasons given by Judge Lario in his opinion reported at 9 N.J. Tax 612 (1986).


Summaries of

Mutch v. New Jersey Div. of Taxation

Tax Court of New Jersey
Feb 1, 1989
11 N.J. Tax 87 (Tax 1989)
Case details for

Mutch v. New Jersey Div. of Taxation

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD L. AND JANET MUTCH, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. NEW JERSEY DIVISION…

Court:Tax Court of New Jersey

Date published: Feb 1, 1989

Citations

11 N.J. Tax 87 (Tax 1989)

Citing Cases

Sidman v. Director, Div. of Taxation

Reck, supra, op. at 610, extended that logic to enable this court, relying on Koch, supra, to not follow an…

Reck v. Director, Division of Taxation

Gross income shall not include amounts contributed by an employer on behalf of and at the election of an…