From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Murry v. Floyd

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION
Apr 9, 2013
1:12CV00095-BSM-JTK (E.D. Ark. Apr. 9, 2013)

Opinion

1:12CV00095-BSM-JTK

04-09-2013

MONTEL DEON MURRY, ADC #134453 PLAINTIFF v. MARY BETH FLOYD, et al. DEFENDANTS


ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the Defendants' Motion to Compel (Doc. No. 70). As of this date, Plaintiff has not filed a response to the Motion. Accordingly,

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file a response to Defendants' Motion to Compel within ten (10) days of the date of this Order. Failure to respond to this Court's Order may result in the dismissal without prejudice of the Plaintiff's Complaint for failure to prosecute. See Local Rule 5.5(c)(2).

IT IS SO ORDERED this 9th day of April, 2013.

____________

JEROME T. KEARNEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Murry v. Floyd

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION
Apr 9, 2013
1:12CV00095-BSM-JTK (E.D. Ark. Apr. 9, 2013)
Case details for

Murry v. Floyd

Case Details

Full title:MONTEL DEON MURRY, ADC #134453 PLAINTIFF v. MARY BETH FLOYD, et al…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Apr 9, 2013

Citations

1:12CV00095-BSM-JTK (E.D. Ark. Apr. 9, 2013)