From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Murray v. Univ. of N.C. at Chapel Hill

SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA
Jun 9, 2017
369 N.C. 585 (N.C. 2017)

Summary

reviewing case law concerning immediate appeals of motions to dismiss under Rules 12(b) and 12(b)

Summary of this case from Seguro-Suarez v. Key Risk Ins. Co.

Opinion

No. 124A16

06-09-2017

Jillian MURRAY v. UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL

Law Firm of Henry Clay Turner, PLLC, by Henry Clay Turner, Chapel Hill, for plaintiff-appellee. Joshua H. Stein, Attorney General, by Elizabeth A. Fisher, Assistant Solicitor General, and Laura Howard McHenry, Assistant Attorney General, for defendant-appellant.


Law Firm of Henry Clay Turner, PLLC, by Henry Clay Turner, Chapel Hill, for plaintiff-appellee.

Joshua H. Stein, Attorney General, by Elizabeth A. Fisher, Assistant Solicitor General, and Laura Howard McHenry, Assistant Attorney General, for defendant-appellant.

PER CURIAM.

As to the appeal of right based on the dissenting opinion, we affirm the majority decision of the Court of Appeals. We conclude that the petition for discretionary review as to the additional issue was improvidently allowed.

AFFIRMED; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.


Summaries of

Murray v. Univ. of N.C. at Chapel Hill

SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA
Jun 9, 2017
369 N.C. 585 (N.C. 2017)

reviewing case law concerning immediate appeals of motions to dismiss under Rules 12(b) and 12(b)

Summary of this case from Seguro-Suarez v. Key Risk Ins. Co.
Case details for

Murray v. Univ. of N.C. at Chapel Hill

Case Details

Full title:JILLIAN MURRAY v. UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL

Court:SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA

Date published: Jun 9, 2017

Citations

369 N.C. 585 (N.C. 2017)
799 S.E.2d 612

Citing Cases

Seguro-Suarez v. Key Risk Ins. Co.

The denial of a motion to dismiss brought pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) is an interlocutory order…

Emanuelson v. Univ. of N.C. at Greensboro

The statute's reach is not obvious from the text, and no state or federal court has contemplated the…