From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Murray v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Jun 4, 2015
164 So. 3d 1251 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

Opinion

No. 1D14–990.

06-04-2015

Mikhail MURRAY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Melissa Joy Ford, Assistant Conflict Counsel, Office of Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel, Region One, Tallahassee, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Samuel B. Steinberg, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Melissa Joy Ford, Assistant Conflict Counsel, Office of Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel, Region One, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Samuel B. Steinberg, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Opinion PER CURIAM.

We affirm Appellant's conviction without comment, but remand to the trial court to correct scrivener's errors in the written sentence and order of probation. The written sentence contains a special provision that Appellant not possess any weapons, guns, or blunt objects, while the trial court's oral pronouncement at sentencing was that Appellant “is not to possess any weapons. No guns, knives, or blunt objects he intends to be used as a weapon.” The written order of probation contains a similar special condition to Appellant's probation and an erroneous indication that Appellant had “been found guilty by the court trying the case without a jury.” Appellant raised these issues in a timely filed motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)(2), but by operation of rule 3.800(b)(2)(B), the motion was deemed denied after 60 days.

We reverse and remand for the trial court to conform the written sentence and order of probation to the oral pronouncement and to correct the order of probation to reflect that Appellant was found guilty by jury verdict. Fisher v. State, 697 So.2d 1291, 1292 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997). Appellant need not be present for the correction of these scrivener's errors. Knight v. State, 114 So.3d 1067, 1067 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013). Appellant's judgment and sentence are otherwise affirmed.

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED with instructions.

LEWIS, C.J., RAY and KELSEY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Murray v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Jun 4, 2015
164 So. 3d 1251 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)
Case details for

Murray v. State

Case Details

Full title:Mikhail MURRAY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Date published: Jun 4, 2015

Citations

164 So. 3d 1251 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

Citing Cases

Braswell v. State

On remand, the trial court should correct the CPC scoresheet and order of probation to reflect that Appellant…