From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Murray v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 12, 2013
No. C 09-5744 CW (N.D. Cal. Mar. 12, 2013)

Opinion

No. C 09-5744 CW

03-12-2013

MARTIN MURRAY, Plaintiff, v. SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO., et al., Defendants.


ORDER DENYING

MOTION FOR

EXTENSION OF TIME

(Docket No. 214)

On March 7, 2013, Plaintiff moved for an extension of time to respond to Defendants' objection to his reply evidence. The local rules do not allow parties to respond to objections to reply evidence without first obtaining leave of the Court, see Civil L.R. 7-3(d), and the Court will not grant Plaintiff leave to file such a response here. Accordingly, the motion is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_______________

CLAUDIA WILKEN

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Murray v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 12, 2013
No. C 09-5744 CW (N.D. Cal. Mar. 12, 2013)
Case details for

Murray v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

Case Details

Full title:MARTIN MURRAY, Plaintiff, v. SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO., et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 12, 2013

Citations

No. C 09-5744 CW (N.D. Cal. Mar. 12, 2013)