From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Murphy v. Sardell

U.S.
Oct 19, 1925
269 U.S. 530 (1925)

Opinion

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Arizona.

No. 18.

Argued October 8, 1925. Decided October 19, 1925.


The judgment of the District Court is affirmed upon the authority of Adkins v. Children's Hospital, 261 U. S. 525. Mr. Justice Holmes requests that it be stated that his concurrence is solely upon the ground that he regards himself bound by the decision in Adkins v. Children's Hospital. Mr. Justice Brandeis dissents. Mr. Earl Anderson, with whom Messrs. James P. Lavin and John W. Murphy were on the brief, for appellants. Messrs. Thomas G. Nairn and Challen B. Ellis, with whom Messrs. Louis Henry Chalmers, Alexander Britton and Leslie C. Hardy were on the brief, for appellee.


Summaries of

Murphy v. Sardell

U.S.
Oct 19, 1925
269 U.S. 530 (1925)
Case details for

Murphy v. Sardell

Case Details

Full title:JOHN W. MURPHY, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA, ET AL. v. A…

Court:U.S.

Date published: Oct 19, 1925

Citations

269 U.S. 530 (1925)

Citing Cases

Morehead v. N.Y. ex Rel. Tipaldo

The decision in that case was twice reaffirmed by this Court. Murphy v. Sardell, 269 U.S. 530; Donham v.…

West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish

The Adkins case, 261 U.S. 525, and like cases decided subsequently, condemn such legislation. Murphy v.…