Opinion
January 23, 1995
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (O'Shaughnessy, J.).
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The unambiguous and unconditional nature of the promissory note which the defendant issued to the plaintiff barred consideration of the parol evidence regarding an alleged oral agreement between the parties which the defendant submitted in opposition to the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (see, Albino v Lipstein, 209 A.D.2d 655). We have considered the defendant's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Rosenblatt, J.P., Altman, Friedmann and Florio, JJ., concur.