From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Murphy v. Murphy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 1, 1928
223 App. Div. 701 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)

Opinion

February, 1928.

Appeal from Supreme Court, Bronx county.


The dismissal being upon the merits and not a nonsuit, a decision was essential. ( McKenna v. Meehan, 220 App. Div. 690; Civ. Prac. Act, §§ 440, 441.) The case is, therefore, remitted to the court at Special Term for the making of a decision, which may be submitted to this court as a supplement to the present record.

See Laws of 1921, chap. 372, amdg. said § 441. — [REP.

Present — Dowling, P.J., Merrell, Martin, O'Malley and Proskauer, JJ. Case remitted to the court at Special Term for a proper decision, which may be submitted to this court as a supplement to the present record.


Summaries of

Murphy v. Murphy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 1, 1928
223 App. Div. 701 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)
Case details for

Murphy v. Murphy

Case Details

Full title:MARION G. MURPHY, Appellant, v. JOHN G. MURPHY, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 1, 1928

Citations

223 App. Div. 701 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)

Citing Cases

Mario v. Oteris

However, since the judgment in favor of defendant was on the merits, and not a nonsuit, a decision, stating…