From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Murphy v. Board of Parole

Oregon Court of Appeals
Oct 2, 1996
140 Or. App. 642 (Or. Ct. App. 1996)

Opinion

CA A83273

Submitted on record and briefs August 25, 1995, affirmed May 1, respondent's motion for reconsideration allowed by opinion October 2, 1996 See 143 Or. App. 605, 925 P.2d 98 (1996)

Judicial Review from Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision.

Robert Doyle Murphy submitted the brief pro se.

Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Robert K. Lau, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Edmonds and Armstrong, Judges.


PER CURIAM

Affirmed.


Petitioner seeks judicial review of an order of the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision that rescinded his parole release date. He contends that the Board violated applicable law by failing to hold a hearing before issuing the order. He asks us to reverse the order and to remand with specific instructions that the Board release petitioner.

We agree with petitioner that the Board violated an applicable rule by failing to hold a hearing prior to issuing its order. We decline, however, to grant petitioner the relief that he seeks. The only relief to which petitioner is entitled is a hearing to determine if he should be released, and the Board held such a hearing after the order on review. Because petitioner has been accorded a full hearing, no further relief remains to be granted. See, e.g., Floyd v. Motor Vehicles Div., 27 Or. App. 41, 44-45, 554 P.2d 1024, rev den 276 Or. 873 (1976).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Murphy v. Board of Parole

Oregon Court of Appeals
Oct 2, 1996
140 Or. App. 642 (Or. Ct. App. 1996)
Case details for

Murphy v. Board of Parole

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT DOYLE MURPHY, Petitioner, v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON…

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Oct 2, 1996

Citations

140 Or. App. 642 (Or. Ct. App. 1996)
915 P.2d 489

Citing Cases

Murphy v. Board of Parole

The Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision has petitioned for reconsideration of our previous opinion.…

Porter v. Bd. of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

Beveridge , 157 Or.App. at 61, 967 P.2d 1238 (rejecting similar argument and concluding that “ ‘[r]escinding’…