From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Murnane v. State of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 13, 2001
288 A.D.2d 277 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

Argued October 23, 2001.

November 13, 2001.

In an claim to recover damages pursuant to Court of Claims Act § 8-b, the claimant appeals from a judgment of the Court of Claims (Ruderman, J), dated June 12, 2000, which, after a nonjury trial, dismissed his claim.

John Kuttas and Robert G. Schneider, Hartsdale, N.Y., for appellant.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney-General, New York, N.Y. (Marion R. Buchbinder and David Lawrence III of counsel), for respondent.

Before: MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, J.P., HOWARD MILLER, SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, BARRY A. COZIER, JJ.


ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Following the reversal of his murder conviction due to legally insufficient evidence after serving 5 1/2 years' imprisonment, the claimant brought this claim pursuant to Court of Claims Act § 8-b, alleging unjust conviction and imprisonment (see, People v. Murnane, 182 A.D.2d 646). Although the claimant presented an alibi defense and supporting witnesses, he did not unequivocally account for his whereabouts during the critical window of time when the murder occurred. Also, the credibility of the alibi witnesses and the veracity of their testimony is a matter for consideration by the trier of fact (see, Robinson v. State of New York, 228 A.D.2d 52). Here, the claimant evaded police for three days after he was told they wanted to question him in connection with the murder and made a statement to police investigators bordering on an admission. Thus, the claimant's own conduct affirmatively contributed to his conviction.

Accordingly, the Court of Claims properly determined that the claimant failed to demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that he was innocent and that his conduct was not a contributing factor in his conviction of the crimes charged in the indictment (see, Taylor v. State of New York, 266 A.D.2d 385).

ALTMAN, J.P., H. MILLER, FEUERSTEIN and COZIER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Murnane v. State of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 13, 2001
288 A.D.2d 277 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Murnane v. State of New York

Case Details

Full title:TERRANCE M. MURNANE, appellant, v. STATE OF NEW YORK, respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 13, 2001

Citations

288 A.D.2d 277 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
733 N.Y.S.2d 123

Citing Cases

Khatibi v. State

Also consistent with innocence, is claimant's act of voluntarily going to the police station later, when he…

Khatibi v. State

The Court did not find it incredible, as defendant argued, that claimant did not recognize his brother Kayvan…