From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Murdocca v. DiGioia

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 30, 1999
264 A.D.2d 509 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

August 30, 1999.

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Thomas, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs.

On March 30, 1995, the defendant Frederick J. Norton was driving a tractor-trailer truck belonging to his employer, the defendant Pauls Trucking Corp., westbound on the Long Island Expressway. The defendant Linda DiGioia was receiving instruction on driving a tractor-trailer from the plaintiff, Pasquale Murdocca, a commercial driving instructor. Norton was proceeding in the center lane while DiGioia was driving in the right lane. The roadway was wet, and when DiGioia applied her brakes her trailer began to fishtail, with its rear moving toward the right. When she released her brakes, the trailer began to straighten out behind the tractor. Norton observed DiGioia braking and fishtailing. He knew that DiGioia was driving a truck that belonged to a commercial driving school, but he did not apply his brakes, downshift, ease up on the gas, or try to avoid DiGioia's vehicle. While DiGioia's trailer was straightening out, she again applied the brakes and her tractor-trailer jackknifed. The front of the trailer moved to the left and entered the center lane, where it struck Norton's vehicle.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party and giving the nonmoving party the benefit of all favorable inferences ( see, Mitchell v. Fiorini Landscape, 253 A.D.2d 860), the impact occurred 13 seconds after Norton saw DiGioia first apply her brakes. Accordingly, the appellants failed to demonstrate their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, as issues of fact exist regarding whether Norton acted reasonably in response to an emergency situation ( see, Ferrer v. Harris, 55 N.Y.2d 285; Hentschel v. Campbell Carpet Servs., 256 A.D.2d 500).

S. Miller, J. P., Joy, H. Miller and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Murdocca v. DiGioia

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 30, 1999
264 A.D.2d 509 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Murdocca v. DiGioia

Case Details

Full title:PASQUALE MURDOCCA, Respondent, v. LINDA DiGIOIA, Respondent, and FREDERICK…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Aug 30, 1999

Citations

264 A.D.2d 509 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
695 N.Y.S.2d 366

Citing Cases

Travelers Property Casualty v. Gomez Supermarket

which the conclusions were based ( Romano v Stanley, 90 N.Y.2d 444, 451; Amatulli v Delhi Constr. Corp., 77…

Travelers Prop. Cas. v. Gomez

anley, 90 NY2d 444, 451 [1997]; Amatulli v Delhi Constr. Corp., 77 NY2d 525, 533-534 n 2 [1991]), established…