From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Munoz v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jun 3, 1986
488 So. 2d 926 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

Opinion

No. 84-1595.

June 3, 1986.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County; David M. Gersten, Judge.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Alan D. Sackrin, Sp. Asst. Public Defender, for appellants.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Richard L. Polin, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BASKIN and JORGENSON, JJ.


Appellants challenge their convictions and sentences based on trafficking in methaqualone and possession of cannabis. Finding that the trial court did not err in denying appellants' motions for judgments of acquittal, Lynch v. State, 293 So.2d 44 (Fla. 1974); Busch v. State, 466 So.2d 1075 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); Greger v. State, 458 So.2d 858 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); that substantial competent evidence exists to support the jury verdict, Toole v. State, 472 So.2d 1174 (Fla. 1985); Heiney v. State, 447 So.2d 210 (Fla.), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 105 S.Ct. 303, 83 L.Ed.2d 237 (1984); Tibbs v. State, 397 So.2d 1120 (Fla. 1981), aff'd, 457 U.S. 31, 102 S.Ct. 2211, 72 L.Ed.2d 652 (1982); and that the prosecution established an adequate chain of custody, Peek v. State, 395 So.2d 492 (Fla.), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 964, 101 S.Ct. 2036, 68 L.Ed.2d 342 (1981); Helton v. State, 424 So.2d 137 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); review denied, 433 So.2d 519 (Fla. 1983); Stunson v. State, 228 So.2d 294 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969), cert. denied, 237 So.2d 179 (Fla. 1970), we affirm. Appellants' remaining point lacks merit.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Munoz v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jun 3, 1986
488 So. 2d 926 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)
Case details for

Munoz v. State

Case Details

Full title:EDUARDO MUNOZ AND JOSE LUIS HERNANDEZ, APPELLANTS, v. THE STATE OF…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jun 3, 1986

Citations

488 So. 2d 926 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)