From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Munoz v. Robinson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Mar 5, 2019
170 A.D.3d 414 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)

Opinion

8578 Index 152701/15

03-05-2019

Sabrina MUNOZ, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. Ricky R. ROBINSON, et al., Defendants–Respondents.

Molod Spitz & DeSantis, P.C., New York (Marcy Sonneborn of counsel), for appellant. DeSena & Sweeney, LLP, Bohemia (Shawn P. O'Shaughnessy of counsel), for Rickey R. Robinson and Denise L. Robinson, respondents. Bamundo, Zwal & Schermerhorn, LLP, New York (Edward W. Chen of counsel), for William Paulino, respondent.


Molod Spitz & DeSantis, P.C., New York (Marcy Sonneborn of counsel), for appellant.

DeSena & Sweeney, LLP, Bohemia (Shawn P. O'Shaughnessy of counsel), for Rickey R. Robinson and Denise L. Robinson, respondents.

Bamundo, Zwal & Schermerhorn, LLP, New York (Edward W. Chen of counsel), for William Paulino, respondent.

Acosta, P.J., Richter, Manzanet–Daniels, Tom, Moulton, JJ.

Defendants established prima facie that plaintiff did not suffer a serious injury to her left knee as a result of the subject accident through the affirmed reports of their experts, who examined plaintiff, documented normal range of motion, and attributed plaintiff's complaints to a preexisting degenerative condition (see e.g. Castro v. DADS Natl. Enters., Inc., 165 A.D.3d 601, 87 N.Y.S.3d 18 [1st Dept. 2018] ).

In opposition, plaintiff raised an issue of fact through the affirmed narrative report of her treating orthopedic surgeon, who documented limitations in plaintiff's range of motion, acknowledged plaintiff's preexisting degenerative condition, and concluded, based on a full review of the medical history, physical examination and observations during surgery, that the accident had severely aggravated plaintiff's condition, necessitating surgery for an acute meniscal tear (see Lazzari v. Qualcon Constr., LLC, 162 A.D.3d 440, 441, 78 N.Y.S.3d 126 [1st Dept. 2018] ; Giap v. Hathi Son Pham, 159 A.D.3d 484, 486, 71 N.Y.S.3d 504 [1st Dept. 2018] ; see also Malloy v. Matute, 79 A.D.3d 584, 913 N.Y.S.2d 95 [1st Dept. 2010] ).


Summaries of

Munoz v. Robinson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Mar 5, 2019
170 A.D.3d 414 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
Case details for

Munoz v. Robinson

Case Details

Full title:Sabrina Munoz, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ricky R. Robinson, et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 5, 2019

Citations

170 A.D.3d 414 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
170 A.D.3d 414
2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 1520

Citing Cases

Reyes v. Melendez

In opposition, plaintiff's submissions are sufficient to raise triable issues of fact as to whether…

Glaze v. Genpi

This evidence was sufficient to meet defendants" prima facie burden with respect to plaintiffs claims of…