From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Muniz v. Muschette

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 5, 2003
305 A.D.2d 384 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2002-05019

Submitted April 2, 2003.

May 5, 2003.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Steinhardt, J.), dated April 8, 2002, as, upon granting the plaintiff's motion for reargument upon his default in opposing the motion, in effect, vacated a prior order of the same court dated July 24, 2002, and denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102(d).

Norman Volk Associates, P.C., New York, N.Y. (Michael I. Josephs of counsel), for appellant.

Gentile Dickler, New York, N.Y. (Gary S. Fish of counsel), for respondent.

Before: ANITA R. FLORIO, J.P., SONDRA MILLER, THOMAS A. ADAMS, REINALDO E. RIVERA, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

No appeal lies from an order made upon the default of the appealing party (see CPLR 5511). The proper procedure is to move to vacate the default and, if necessary, appeal from the order determining that motion (see Smith v. Richards, 286 A.D.2d 393; High v. Coletti, 143 A.D.2d 810).

FLORIO, J.P., S. MILLER, ADAMS and RIVERA, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Muniz v. Muschette

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 5, 2003
305 A.D.2d 384 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Muniz v. Muschette

Case Details

Full title:RAUL MUNIZ, respondent, v. LEONARD D. MUSCHETTE, appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 5, 2003

Citations

305 A.D.2d 384 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
758 N.Y.S.2d 509