From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Multiquest, P.L.L.C. v. Allstate Ins. Co

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 3, 2008
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 50741 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

2006-1357 Q C.

Decided April 3, 2008.

Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County (Joseph Esposito, J.), entered December 6, 2005. The order denied defendant's motion for summary judgment ( 10 Misc 3d 877).

PRESENT:: GOLIA, J.P., PESCE and RIOS, JJ.


Order modified by providing that the motion is denied without prejudice to renewal upon proper papers; as so modified, affirmed without costs.

Under the circumstances presented and for the reasons set forth in Multiquest, P.L.L.C. v Allstate Ins Co. ( 16 Misc 3d 137[A], 2007 NY Slip Op 51735[U] [App Term, 2d 11th Jud Dists 2007]), the matter should have been denied without prejudice to renewal upon proper papers ( see Wider v Heller , 24 AD3d 433 ). In view of the foregoing, we do not reach the parties' contentions with regard to the merits of the motion ( see id.).

Pesce and Rios, JJ., concur.

Golia, J.P., dissents in a separate memorandum.

Golia, J.P., dissents and votes to reverse the order and grant defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint in the following memorandum:

The simplicity of the majority decision belies the reasoning which lies behind its singular determination. Indeed, my colleagues sua sponte raise the issue concerning the absence of the complaint and the answer, when a simple dismissal is not only the clear and obvious resolution but is also mandated by the facts and law. The pleadings are contained in the court's own file.

It is incontestable that at the time the services that are the subject of this claim were rendered, plaintiff Multiquest, P.L.L.C. was not eligible for reimbursement because it was fraudulently incorporated ( see State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v Mallela , 4 NY3d 313 ). This fact has been previously determined after the alleged incorporator, Dr. Kathryn Clark, testified that she was never an owner or manager of plaintiff ( see Multiquest, P.L.L.C. v Allstate Ins. Co. , 17 Misc 3d 37 [App Term, 2d 11th Jud Dists 2007]).

I find it inappropriate under these facts to now search for reasons to burden the parties and the courts with additional motions.


Summaries of

Multiquest, P.L.L.C. v. Allstate Ins. Co

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 3, 2008
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 50741 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

Multiquest, P.L.L.C. v. Allstate Ins. Co

Case Details

Full title:MULTIQUEST, P.L.L.C. a/a/o JEAN JOSEPH JEUNE, Respondent, v. ALLSTATE…

Court:Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 3, 2008

Citations

2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 50741 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)