From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mullins v. State

Court of Appeals of Indiana, Third District
Feb 28, 1994
629 N.E.2d 886 (Ind. Ct. App. 1994)

Opinion

No. 49A02-9301-CR-18.

February 28, 1994.

Appeal from the Marion County Municipal Court, David A. Jester, J.

J.J. Paul, III Symmes Voyles Zahn Paul Hogan, Indianapolis, for appellant-defendant.

Pamela Carter, Atty. Gen., Preston W. Black, Deputy Atty. Gen., Indianapolis, for appellee-plaintiff.


Appellant-defendant Michael C. Mullins appeals his conviction for operating a vehicle with at least ten-hundredths percent (.10%) by weight of alcohol in his blood, a Class C misdemeanor.

One issue raised by Mullins is dispositive of the appeal: whether the evidence is sufficient to sustain his conviction. A court reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence will neither weigh the evidence nor judge the credibility of the witnesses. The court will consider only the evidence most favorable to the verdict, together with all reasonable inferences therefrom. If substantial evidence of probative value exists from which a trier of fact could find guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, the judgment must be affirmed. Johnson v. State (1992), Ind. App., 593 N.E.2d 208, 209.

The statute under which Mullins was convicted provides, in pertinent part:

"(a) A person who operates a vehicle with at least ten-hundredths percent (0.10%) by weight of alcohol in the person's blood commits a Class C misdemeanor."

IND. CODE § 9-30-5-1 (1991 Supp.). The evidence adduced at trial does not relate Mullins' percentage of blood alcohol by weight. State's Exhibit No. 3 is a "BAC DataMaster Evidence Ticket" which recorded a "BREATH ANALYSIS" of .20. The police officer testified that the test "results were .20 at 2:39, percent blood alcohol content." Neither the "Evidence Ticket," nor the officer's testimony reveals the percentage by weight.

See Baran v. State (1993), Ind. App., 622 N.E.2d 1326, 1327-1328, Rucker, J. dissenting, (absent evidence of percentage by weight, evidence insufficient to support verdict);

but see Daum v. State (1993), Ind. App., 625 N.E.2d 1296 .

The State's contention that the test results are implicitly by weight is unavailing. Penal statutes must be strictly construed against the State. Spangler v. State (1993), Ind., 607 N.E.2d 720, 723. "In construing a statute, effect should be given to every word and clause therein." Id. Accordingly the clause, "by weight," cannot be ignored. Further, this Court cannot supply missing evidence by implying its existence.

Therefore, the evidence is insufficient to support the conviction. The judgment of conviction is reversed.

Reversed.

STATON and GARRARD, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Mullins v. State

Court of Appeals of Indiana, Third District
Feb 28, 1994
629 N.E.2d 886 (Ind. Ct. App. 1994)
Case details for

Mullins v. State

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL C. MULLINS, APPELLANT-DEFENDANT, v. STATE OF INDIANA…

Court:Court of Appeals of Indiana, Third District

Date published: Feb 28, 1994

Citations

629 N.E.2d 886 (Ind. Ct. App. 1994)

Citing Cases

Mullins v. State

SULLIVAN, Justice. This case comes to us on the State's petition to transfer the decision of the Court of…

Baran v. State

Thus, in order to be properly certified by the Department of Toxicology, the machines must measure blood…