Summary
observing that because the claimant's treating physician did not treat the claimant's degenerative disc disease, the extent of the treatment for this impairment was an appropriate factor in considering the weight the treating physician's opinion was due
Summary of this case from Valle v. ColvinOpinion
No. 3:14-CV-352-PLR-CCS
07-07-2015
Memorandum Opinion
This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation filed by United States Magistrate Judge, C. Clifford Shirley, Jr. [R. 17]. There have been no timely objections to the Report and Recommendation, and enough time has passed since the filing of the Report and Recommendation to treat any objections as having been waived. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b).
After a careful review of this matter, the Court is in complete agreement with the Magistrate Judge's conclusion that the plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings [R. 13] should be denied, and the Commissioner's motion for summary judgment [R. 15] be granted. Accordingly, the Court ACCEPTS IN WHOLE the Report and Recommendation under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). It is ORDERED, for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, which the Court adopts and incorporates into its ruling, that plaintiff Bill Mullins's motion for judgment on the pleadings [R. 13] is DENIED; the Commissioner's motion for summary judgment [R. 15] is GRANTED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/_________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE