From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Muller v. Ackerman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 1, 1936
246 App. Div. 849 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)

Opinion

January, 1936.


Order, in so far as an appeal is taken therefrom, denying examination before trial of defendant Ackerman, reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs; the examination to proceed on five days' notice. If the action were for an accounting alone the plaintiff would not be entitled to the examination, but the action is for more than an accounting. The complaint alleges that plaintiff — a coadventurer — has been deprived of his property and its profits through the fraud of respondent, who acted in a fiduciary capacity. Under the circumstances plaintiff was entitled to examine defendant with respect to the items mentioned in the notice of motion. ( Wertheim v. Grombecker, 229 App. Div. 16; Muller v. Ackerman, 246 id. 639.) Lazansky, P.J., Hagarty, Davis, Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Muller v. Ackerman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 1, 1936
246 App. Div. 849 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)
Case details for

Muller v. Ackerman

Case Details

Full title:ABRAHAM MULLER, Appellant, v. EDNA E. ACKERMAN, Respondent, and Others…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 1, 1936

Citations

246 App. Div. 849 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)

Citing Cases

Tricarico v. Socy. of Saint Joseph Palo Del Colle

) This action is for much more than an accounting, and the fact that plaintiffs demand, along with relief in…

Tricarico v. Socy. of Saint Joseph Palo Del Colle

This action is for much more than an accounting, and the fact that plaintiffs demand, along with relief in…