Mullen v. Mullen

Full title: MARY H. MULLEN, respondent, v. MARY SEREFIN MULLEN et al., appellants

Court: Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Oct 19, 1925

98 N.J. Eq. 728 (N.J. 1925)

Opinion

Argued May term, 1925.

Decided October 19th, 1925.

On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Fielder, whose opinion is reported in 98 N.J. Eq. 90.

Mr. Merritt Lane, for the appellants.

Messrs. Wall, Haight, Carey Hartpence, for the respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Fielder.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, PARKER, MINTURN, KALISCH, BLACK, KAYS, JJ. 6.

For reversal — KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, WHITE, VAN BUSKIRK, JJ. 5.