From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mullen v. Glimcher Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Oct 10, 2012
No. CV 12-01782-PHX-FJM (D. Ariz. Oct. 10, 2012)

Opinion

No. CV 12-01782-PHX-FJM BK 11-15333-RJH

10-10-2012

Brian J. Mullen, Trustee, Plaintiff, v. The Glimcher Company, Defendant.


ORDER

We have before us the motion of defendant to withdraw bankruptcy reference (doc. 1), plaintiff's response (doc. 6), and defendant's reply (doc. 8). Defendant seeks to withdraw the reference of this adversary proceeding, asserting a right to a jury trial.

Debtor David Glimcher transferred over $949,000 in securities to his father's company, defendant The Glimcher Company, on May 19, 2011. On May 26, 2011, David Glimcher filed for bankruptcy. The trustee filed a complaint to recover this money as either a preferential transfer or a fraudulent conveyance, or pursuant to his avoidance rights under 11 U.S.C. § 544. Defendant demanded a jury trial in its answer and filed this motion 20 days later.

I

We "may withdraw, in whole or in part, any case or proceeding referred under this section, on [our] own motion or on timely motion of any party, for cause shown." 28 U.S.C. § 157(d). Factors to consider in determining cause include "the efficient use of judicial resources, delay and costs to the parties, uniformity of bankruptcy administration, the prevention of forum shopping, and other related factors." Sec. Farms v. Int'l Bhd. of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers, 124 F.3d 999, 1008 (9th Cir. 1997).

The bankruptcy court may "retain jurisdiction over the action until trial is actually ready." In re Healthcentral.com, 504 F.3d 775, 788 (9th Cir. 2007) (emphasis in original). Discovery matters, pre-trial conferences, and routine motions may be handled by a bankruptcy court without abridging a party's Seventh Amendment right to a jury trial.Id. at 787. In addition, the bankruptcy system promotes judicial economy and efficiency, goals that would be subverted if an action were required to be immediately transferred to district court because of a jury trial right. See id. at 787-88. Even after Stern v. Marshall, 131 S. Ct. 2594 (2011), a bankruptcy court may adjudicate dispositive motions and issue a report and recommendation before withdrawal. See Loomis v. Hunter, Humphrey & Yavitz, PLC, No. CV-12-0586-PHX-FJM, 2012 WL 3064496 (D. Ariz. July 27, 2012).

IT IS ORDERED DENYING the motion to withdraw bankruptcy reference (doc. 1).

__________________

Frederick J. Martone

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Mullen v. Glimcher Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Oct 10, 2012
No. CV 12-01782-PHX-FJM (D. Ariz. Oct. 10, 2012)
Case details for

Mullen v. Glimcher Co.

Case Details

Full title:Brian J. Mullen, Trustee, Plaintiff, v. The Glimcher Company, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Date published: Oct 10, 2012

Citations

No. CV 12-01782-PHX-FJM (D. Ariz. Oct. 10, 2012)