From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mullaney v. Koenig

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 12, 2005
21 A.D.3d 939 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

2004-03641.

September 12, 2005.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Oliver, J.), dated February 13, 2004, which granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Kressel, Rothlein, Walsh Roth, LLC, Massapequa, N.Y. (Stephen Kressel of counsel), for appellant.

Congdon, Flaherty, O'Callaghan, Reid, Donlon, Travis Fishlinger, Uniondale, N.Y. (Kathleen D. Foley of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Florio, J.P., Adams, Luciano and Skelos, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, it is proper for this Court, on appeal, to consider the defendants' contention that the record contains no evidence of a defective or dangerous condition existing on their premises at the time of the accident ( see Block v. Magee, 146 AD2d 730). The defendants established a prima facie case that no dangerous or defective condition existed on their premises at the time of the accident ( see Christopher v. New York City Tr. Auth., 300 AD2d 336). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Therefore, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendants' motion.


Summaries of

Mullaney v. Koenig

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 12, 2005
21 A.D.3d 939 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

Mullaney v. Koenig

Case Details

Full title:AGNES MULLANEY, Appellant, v. JOSEPH KOENIG et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Sep 12, 2005

Citations

21 A.D.3d 939 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
2005 N.Y. Slip Op. 6660
801 N.Y.S.2d 343

Citing Cases

Slattery v. Tops Mkts., LLC

We agree with defendant that Supreme Court erred in denying its motion seeking summary judgment dismissing…

Mineola v. Anderson

Although this issue is raised for the first time on appeal, both parties have briefed it and they concede…