Opinion
CV421-036
05-24-2023
ORDER
WILLIAM T. MOORE, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
Before the Court is the Magistrate Judge's April 28, 2023, Report and Recommendation (Doc. 18), to which no party has filed objections. After a careful review of the record, the report and recommendation (Doc. 18) is ADOPTED as the Court's opinion in this case. Plaintiff's Consent Motion for Attorney's Fees and Costs under the Equal Access to Justice Act ("EAJA") is GRANTED. (Doc. 17.) Plaintiff is awarded $3,781.20 in attorney's fees and $21.48 in expenses under the EAJA.
The Court reviews de novo a magistrate judge's findings to which a party objects, and the Court reviews for clear error the portions of a report and recommendation to which a party does not object. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see Merchant v. Nationwide Recovery Serv., Inc,, 440 F.Supp.3d 1369, 1371 (N.D.Ga. 2020) (citing Macort v. Prem, Inc., 208 Fed.Appx. 781, 784 (11th Cir. 2006) (per curiam)) (outlining the standard of review for report and recommendations) .
Upon entry of this order, the Commissioner will determine whether Plaintiff owes a debt to the Government that qualifies under the Treasury Offset Program, 31 U.S.C. §§ 3711, 3716. If Plaintiff owes such a debt, the fee award will be applied towards that debt with any remaining funds remitted to Plaintiff. The Government may, in its discretion, accept Plaintiff's assignment of EAJA fees and pay the fees and expenses directly to Plaintiff's counsel.
SO ORDERED.