From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Muhitch v. St. Gregory

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 30, 1997
239 A.D.2d 901 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

May 30, 1997

Present — Green, J.P., Pine, Lawton, Doerr and Fallon, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted that part of defendant's motion pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7) seeking dismissal of the first cause of action, which alleged breach of an employment contract. The contract, dated June 16, 1994, provided that defendant would employ plaintiff as an elementary school teacher until the last day of school in June 1995. Plaintiff completed that school year but was not offered a contract for the following year. Because the contract did not provide for renewal of plaintiff's employment, the complaint fails to state a cause of action for breach of contract ( see generally, Fritzsch v. County of Chenango, 198 A.D.2d 650). The "good cause" provision of the contract referred to by plaintiff would apply only if she had been terminated during the 1994-1995 school year.

The court did not abuse its discretion in denying plaintiff's request to amend the complaint to allege breach of implied contract. Where, as here, "an express contract exists between the parties concerning the same subject matter, there may be no recovery upon a theory of implied contract" ( Nixon Gear Mach. v Nixon Gear, 86 A.D.2d 746).

We reject the contention of defendant on its cross appeal that the court should also have dismissed the second cause of action, alleging a violation of Labor Law § 201-d (2). That subdivision prohibits discrimination by "any employer" on any of several grounds. Subparagraph (d) covers "an individual's membership in a union or any exercise of rights granted under Title 29, USCA, Chapter 7 [National Labor Relations Act] or under article fourteen of the civil service law [Taylor Law]." (Emphasis added.) Contrary to defendant's contention, the use of the conjunction "or" in Labor Law § 201-d(2)(d) indicates that the protection of the statute extends to members of any union and is not limited to members of unions subject to the National Labor Relations Act or the Taylor Law. (Appeals from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Glownia, J. — Dismiss Cause of Action.)


Summaries of

Muhitch v. St. Gregory

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 30, 1997
239 A.D.2d 901 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Muhitch v. St. Gregory

Case Details

Full title:MARY A. MUHITCH, Appellant-Respondent, v. ST. GREGORY THE GREAT ROMAN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: May 30, 1997

Citations

239 A.D.2d 901 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
659 N.Y.S.2d 679

Citing Cases

Muhitch v. St. Gregory

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Same Memorandum as in Muhitch v. St. Gregory the Great R.C. Church …

Germano v. Cornell University

(Def. Mem. at 10). While Defendants have correctly stated the law, see Stissi v. Interstate Ocean Transp. Co.…