From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mugabo v. City of Buffalo

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Apr 27, 2012
94 A.D.3d 1577 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

2012-04-27

Augustin MUGABO, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. CITY OF BUFFALO, Defendant–Respondent.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Frederick J. Marshall, J.), entered October 1, 2010. The order denied the pro se motion of plaintiff for leave to renew and reargue his prior summary judgment motion and his opposition to defendant's cross motion for summary judgment.Augustin Mugabo, plaintiff-appellant pro se. David Rodriguez, Acting Corporation Counsel, Buffalo (David M. Lee of Counsel), for defendant-respondent.


Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Frederick J. Marshall, J.), entered October 1, 2010. The order denied the pro se motion of plaintiff for leave to renew and reargue his prior summary judgment motion and his opposition to defendant's cross motion for summary judgment.Augustin Mugabo, plaintiff-appellant pro se. David Rodriguez, Acting Corporation Counsel, Buffalo (David M. Lee of Counsel), for defendant-respondent.

MEMORANDUM:

Plaintiff appeals from an order denying his pro se motion for leave to renew and reargue his prior motion for summary judgment on the amended complaint and his opposition to defendant's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the amended complaint. As plaintiff conceded during oral argument on his motion for leave to renew and reargue, he offered no *854 new facts in support thereof. Instead, plaintiff merely argued that Supreme Court had misapprehended the law and therefore reached the wrong conclusion with respect to the prior motion and cross motion. Thus, plaintiff's motion for leave to renew and reargue was actually only a motion for leave to reargue, and it is well settled that no appeal lies from an order denying such a motion ( see Hill v. Milan, 89 A.D.3d 1458, 1458, 932 N.Y.S.2d 411; Hilliard v. Highland Hosp., 88 A.D.3d 1291, 1292–1293, 930 N.Y.S.2d 390; Schaner v. Mercy Hosp. of Buffalo, 16 A.D.3d 1095, 1096, 791 N.Y.S.2d 740). The appeal therefore must be dismissed.

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs.

SMITH, J.P., FAHEY, PERADOTTO, and LINDLEY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Mugabo v. City of Buffalo

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Apr 27, 2012
94 A.D.3d 1577 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

Mugabo v. City of Buffalo

Case Details

Full title:Augustin MUGABO, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. CITY OF BUFFALO…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Date published: Apr 27, 2012

Citations

94 A.D.3d 1577 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 3355
942 N.Y.S.2d 853

Citing Cases

Licciardi v. City of Rochester

Plaintiff appeals from an order denying his motion for leave to renew or reargue the motion of defendant…