From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mudry v. Giannattasio

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 14, 2004
8 A.D.3d 455 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

2003-09115.

Decided June 14, 2004.

In an action, inter alia, to impose a constructive trust on certain real property, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Ruchelsman, J.), dated August 11, 2003, which granted the defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground that the action was barred by the doctrine of res judicata.

Connors and Sullivan, P.C., Brooklyn, N.Y. (Christopher M. Otton of counsel), for apellant.

Frank M. Graziadei, P.C., New York, N.Y., for respondent.

Before: ANITA R. FLORIO, J.P., THOMAS A. ADAMS, BARRY A. COZIER, ROBERT A. LIFSON, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is denied, and the complaint is reinstated.

Because the prior determination upon which the order appealed from was predicated did not indicate an intention to dismiss on the merits, the order cannot be deemed a basis for the application of the doctrines of res judicata or collateral estoppel. Accordingly, the defendant's motion to dismiss should have been denied.

FLORIO, J.P., ADAMS, COZIER and LIFSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Mudry v. Giannattasio

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 14, 2004
8 A.D.3d 455 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

Mudry v. Giannattasio

Case Details

Full title:ALBERT MUDRY, ETC., appellant, v. JAMES A. GIANNATTASIO, respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 14, 2004

Citations

8 A.D.3d 455 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
779 N.Y.S.2d 111

Citing Cases

Rosen v. Levy

is well settled that the doctrine of res judicata only bars a subsequent action when the prior action was…

Tuper v. Tuper

The doctrine of collateral estoppel precludes a party from raising, in subsequent litigation, any issue that…