From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Muben-Lamar v. Florida Dept. of Revenue

Supreme Court of Florida
Jun 28, 2001
789 So. 2d 337 (Fla. 2001)

Opinion

No. SC00-1111.

Opinion filed June 28, 2001.

Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal — Direct Conflict First District — Case No. 1D99-1810 (Leon County).

Larry E. Levy, Tallahassee, Florida, and William J. Deas, Jacksonville, Florida, for Petitioner.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Jeffrey M. Dikman, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, Florida, for Respondent.


We initially accepted for review Muben-Lamar, L.P. v. Department of Revenue, 763 So.2d 1209 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000), on the basis of express and direct conflict with Kuro, Inc. v. State Department of Revenue, 713 So.2d 1021 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998). See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. Upon further consideration, we determine that jurisdiction was improvidently granted. Accordingly, we hereby dismiss review of this cause.

It is so ordered.

WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., concur.

NO MOTION FOR REHEARING WILL BE ALLOWED.


Summaries of

Muben-Lamar v. Florida Dept. of Revenue

Supreme Court of Florida
Jun 28, 2001
789 So. 2d 337 (Fla. 2001)
Case details for

Muben-Lamar v. Florida Dept. of Revenue

Case Details

Full title:MUBEN-LAMAR, L.P., etc., Petitioner, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Jun 28, 2001

Citations

789 So. 2d 337 (Fla. 2001)

Citing Cases

Crescent Miami Ctr. v. D.O.R

The majority certified express and direct conflict with Kuro. The Florida Supreme Court initially granted…

Crescent Miami Center v. Dept. of Revenue

We granted review in Muben-Lamar on the basis of its conflict with Kuro, but we subsequently dismissed…