From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mtr. of Jeanty v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 23, 2007
36 A.D.3d 811 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)

Summary

holding that New York State Division of Human Rights was a necessary party to an Article 78 proceeding challenging its determination that the respondent employer had not discriminated against the petitioner

Summary of this case from 910 W. END AVE RL v. VARIOUS TENANTS OF 910 W. END

Opinion

No. 2006-00362.

January 23, 2007.

In a proceeding pursuant to Executive Law § 298 to review a determination of the New York State Division of Human Rights, dated March 30, 2005, which, after a hearing, found that the New York State Department of Correctional Services and the Green Haven Correctional Facility had not unlawfully discriminated against the petitioner on the bases of race and national origin, the petitioner appeals from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Brands, J.), dated December 1, 2005, which granted that branch of the respondents' motion which was to dismiss the petition for failure to join a necessary party and, in effect, denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Jacobowitz Gubits, LLP, Walden, N.Y. (Joseph J. Ranni of counsel), for appellant.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney-General, New York, N.Y. (Michael S. Belohlavek and Carol Fischer of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Krausman, J.P., Florio, Lunn and Covello, JJ.


Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court correctly granted that branch of the respondents' motion which was to dismiss the petition for failure to join a necessary party. The petitioner failed to join as a party respondent the New York State Division of Human Rights, which issued the determination challenged herein ( see CPLR 1001 [a]; Executive Law § 298; 22 NYCRR 202.57 [a]; Matter of Boston Culinary Group, Inc. v New York State Olympic Regional Dev. Auth., 18 AD3d 1103; Matter of Lodge v D'Aliso, 2 AD3d 525; Matter of Ogbunugafor v New York State Educ. Dept., 279 AD2d 738, 739-740).

The petitioner's remaining contentions are without merit.


Summaries of

Mtr. of Jeanty v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 23, 2007
36 A.D.3d 811 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)

holding that New York State Division of Human Rights was a necessary party to an Article 78 proceeding challenging its determination that the respondent employer had not discriminated against the petitioner

Summary of this case from 910 W. END AVE RL v. VARIOUS TENANTS OF 910 W. END
Case details for

Mtr. of Jeanty v. State

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of DARLY JEANTY, Appellant, v. NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 23, 2007

Citations

36 A.D.3d 811 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 532
828 N.Y.S.2d 499

Citing Cases

Watkins v. N.Y. State Div. of Human Rights

B. Necessary Joinder of Parties When a plaintiff fails to name a necessary party, dismissal of the preceding…

Wahab v. Maple Crest Garden Apartments

A proceeding to review a determination of the DHR "shall be commenced by the filing of a notice of petition…