From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mount v. Mount

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 27, 1922
138 N.E. 449 (N.Y. 1922)

Opinion

Argued October 10, 1922

Decided October 27, 1922

William H. Hamilton and Norman C. Conklin for plaintiff, appellant.

David B. Simpson for Clarence M. Davis et al., defendants, appellants.

Samuel Crook for Elizabeth Mount, as executrix of Maria L. Mount, deceased, defendant, appellant.

Howard C. Taylor for Alice DeGray Desvernine et al., defendants, appellants.

James A. O'Gorman, Lanman Crosby and Almuth C. Vandiver for Frances DeG. Mount et al., respondents.

Clarence J. Hand and Joseph M. Adrian for trustees of Charlotte A. Mount, deceased, respondents.

John M. Perry for Elizabeth J. Mount, respondent.

Addison A. Van Tine for Helen R. Leslie, as executrix of Charles J. Leslie, deceased, respondent.


Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: HISCOCK, Ch. J., HOGAN, CARDOZO, POUND, McLAUGHLIN, CRANE and ANDREWS, JJ.


Summaries of

Mount v. Mount

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 27, 1922
138 N.E. 449 (N.Y. 1922)
Case details for

Mount v. Mount

Case Details

Full title:ELIZABETH MOUNT, Appellant, v . RICHARD H. MOUNT et al., Respondents, and…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 27, 1922

Citations

138 N.E. 449 (N.Y. 1922)
138 N.E. 449

Citing Cases

Mount v. Mount

Motion to amend remittitur granted, return of remittitur requested and when returned the same to be amended…

Matter of Trischett

( Purdy et al. v. Hoyt et al., 92 N.Y. 446.) The provisions might also be upheld if it were intended to…