From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moultrie v. State

Florida Court of Appeals, First District
May 15, 2024
385 So. 3d 1122 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2024)

Opinion

No. 1D2022-1685

05-15-2024

Charles Lee MOULTRIE, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Danielle Jorden, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Zachary Lawton, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County. John F. Simon, Jr., Judge.

Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Danielle Jorden, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Zachary Lawton, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam

Charles Lee Moultrie, Jr. appeals his judgment and sentence, which stems from the revocation of his probation for a new law violation. Moultrie argues the trial court erred in denying a dispositive motion to suppress, which led to the revocation, and in imposing a $100 cost under section 938.27(8), Florida Statutes, at sentencing. We affirm the judgment and sentence. Further, the trial court’s imposition of the $100 cost under section 938.27(8) was mandatory, and therefore appropriate. See Parks v. State, 371 So. 3d 392 (Fla. 1st DCA 2023), review granted in Parks v. State of Florida, No. SC2023-1355, 2024 WL 370043 (Fla. Jan. 31, 2024).

Affirmed.

Lewis, Winokur, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Moultrie v. State

Florida Court of Appeals, First District
May 15, 2024
385 So. 3d 1122 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2024)
Case details for

Moultrie v. State

Case Details

Full title:Charles Lee Moultrie, Jr., Appellant, v. State of Florida, Appellee.

Court:Florida Court of Appeals, First District

Date published: May 15, 2024

Citations

385 So. 3d 1122 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2024)