From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mouer v. Maquet, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 12, 2013
Case No.: C 13-00298 MEJ (N.D. Cal. Mar. 12, 2013)

Opinion

Case No.: C 13-00298 MEJ

03-12-2013

CHRISTOPHER MOUER, Plaintiff, v. MAQUET, INC.; a corporation; KEVIN GILROY, an individual; and DOES 1-40, inclusive; Defendants.

FOX ROTHSCHILD, LLP Keith Chrestionson Tyreen Torner Attorneys for Defendants MAQUET, INC. and KEVIN GILROY MAYALL HURLEY, P.C. Mark S. Adams Alexander G. Henry Attorneys for Plaintiff, CHRISTOPHER MOUER


MAYALL HURLEY
A Professional Corporation
2453 Grand Canal Boulevard
Stockton, California 95207-8253
Telephone (209) 477-3833
MARK S. ADAMS
CA State Bar No. 78706
ALEXANDER G. HENRY
CA State Bar No. 238264
Attorneys for Plaintiff, CHRISTOPHER MOUER

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

REMANDING CASE TO SAN FRANCISCO

COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT

WHEREAS:

1. On November 2, 2012, Plaintiff, Christopher Mouer, filed his complaint for damages entitled Christopher Mouer v. Maquet Inc., a corporation; Kevin Gilroy, an individual; and Does 1-40, case number CGC-12-525714 in San Francisco County Superior Court (the "Complaint").
2. On January 22, 2013, defendant Maquet, Inc. filed its Notice of Removal in the Northern District of California.
3. Prior to Plaintiff filing a Motion to Remand, the parties met and conferred on the issues to be raised by Plaintiff's motion. After meeting and conferring in good-faith, the parties have agreed that the above-entitled matter, case number C 13-00298 MEJ, should
properly be remanded back to San Francisco Superior Court.
4. Based upon the legal authorities cited by Plaintiff and the anticipated amendments to the Complaint, the parties agree that Kevin Gilroy can be properly joined as a defendant. Because both Plaintiff and defendant Gilroy are residents of California, the court lacks subject matter jurisdiction and remand to San Francisco County Superior Court is proper.
5. Each party is to bear its own costs and fees.

FOX ROTHSCHILD, LLP

_____________

Keith Chrestionson

Tyreen Torner

Attorneys for Defendants

MAQUET, INC. and

KEVIN GILROY

MAYALL HURLEY, P.C.

_____________

Mark S. Adams

Alexander G. Henry

Attorneys for Plaintiff,

CHRISTOPHER MOUER

ORDER

The undersigned judge, having reviewed the foregoing Stipulation of the Parties and good cause appearing therefore, hereby ORDERS that the above-entitled matter, Christopher Mouer v. Maquet, Inc. et al., Case No. C 13-00298 MEJ be remanded back to San Francisco County Superior Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Judge Maria-Elena James


Summaries of

Mouer v. Maquet, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 12, 2013
Case No.: C 13-00298 MEJ (N.D. Cal. Mar. 12, 2013)
Case details for

Mouer v. Maquet, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER MOUER, Plaintiff, v. MAQUET, INC.; a corporation; KEVIN…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 12, 2013

Citations

Case No.: C 13-00298 MEJ (N.D. Cal. Mar. 12, 2013)