From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Motley v. Baldwin

United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Richmond Division
May 6, 2011
Civil Action No. 3:11CV137 (E.D. Va. May. 6, 2011)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 3:11CV137.

May 6, 2011


MEMORANDUM OPINION


By Memorandum Order entered on March 10, 2011, the Court conditionally docketed Plaintiff's action. At that time, the Court directed Plaintiff to affirm her intention to pay the full filing fee by signing and returning a consent to the collection of fees form. The Court warned Plaintiff that a failure to comply with either of the above directives within thirty (30) days of the date of entry thereof would result in summary dismissal of the action.

Plaintiff has not complied with Court's order to return a consent to collection of fees form. As a result, she does not qualify for in forma pauperis status. Furthermore, she has not paid the statutory filing fee for the instant complaint. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). Plaintiff's actions demonstrate a wilful failure to prosecute. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b). Accordingly, this action will be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

It is so ORDERED.


Summaries of

Motley v. Baldwin

United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Richmond Division
May 6, 2011
Civil Action No. 3:11CV137 (E.D. Va. May. 6, 2011)
Case details for

Motley v. Baldwin

Case Details

Full title:JANICE DENICE MOTLEY, Plaintiff, v. MS. BALDWIN, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Richmond Division

Date published: May 6, 2011

Citations

Civil Action No. 3:11CV137 (E.D. Va. May. 6, 2011)