From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Motion Docket

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jan 1, 1996
75 Ohio St. 3d 1449 (Ohio 1996)

Summary

observing that "[i]n cases involving the revocation of a certificate to practice medicine, generally the interests are great: the state's interest in protecting the public and the physician's interest in maintaining a livelihood"

Summary of this case from Haver v. Accountancy Board of Ohio

Opinion

1996.


Summaries of

Motion Docket

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jan 1, 1996
75 Ohio St. 3d 1449 (Ohio 1996)

observing that "[i]n cases involving the revocation of a certificate to practice medicine, generally the interests are great: the state's interest in protecting the public and the physician's interest in maintaining a livelihood"

Summary of this case from Haver v. Accountancy Board of Ohio
Case details for

Motion Docket

Case Details

Full title:MOTION DOCKET

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Jan 1, 1996

Citations

75 Ohio St. 3d 1449 (Ohio 1996)
663 N.E.2d 324

Citing Cases

Williams v. Coyle

Again he asserted that his counsel were ineffective and that the prosecution violated his due process rights…

State v. Williams

In each case, his appeal was unsuccessful. See State v. Williams (1991), 74 Ohio App.3d 686, 600 N.E.2d 298,…