From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mossler v. Aetna Life Ins. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 21, 2014
Case No. 2:13-cv-01945-SJO(MRWx) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 21, 2014)

Summary

considering the plaintiff's SSDI award because the decision constituted additional support in determining plaintiff's benefit entitlement

Summary of this case from Gallegos v. Prudential Ins. Co. of Am.

Opinion

Case No. 2:13-cv-01945-SJO(MRWx)

07-21-2014

C. ROSS MOSSLER, Plaintiff, v. AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant.

ROBERT J. ROSATI, State Bar No. 112006 THORNTONDAVIDSON, State Bar No. 166487 ERISA Law Group LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff, C. ROSS MOSSLER


ROBERT J. ROSATI, State Bar No. 112006
THORNTONDAVIDSON, State Bar No. 166487
ERISA Law Group LLP
Attorneys for Plaintiff,
C. ROSS MOSSLER

JUDGMENT

IT IS HEREBY DECLARED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED THAT DEFENDANT AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY SHALL: (1) Grant long term disability benefits to Plaintiff C. Ross Mossler for the period from January 11, 2012 through April 30, 2012 and pay to C. Ross Mossler benefits for that period totaling $2,811.99 plus prejudgment interest in the amount to be determined by timely motion or stipulation; (2) that the determination of Plaintiff C. Ross Mossler's entitlement to long term disability benefits under the "own occupation" standard of Policy No. GP-62135 for the period from May 1, 2012 through January 10, 2014 and, if Plaintiff is entitled to benefits under the "own occupation" standard for this period,under the "any occupation" standard under Policy No. GP-621353 for the period from January 11, 2014 thereafter are remanded to defendant Aetna Life Insurance Company for further consideration and determination after submission of additional medical evidence for the period from May 1, 2012 to the present. It is further ordered, adjudged and decreed that Defendant Aetna Life Insurance Company shall pay the plaintiff C. Ross Mossler and his counsel of record, the ERISA Law Group, attorneys fees in an amount to be determined by timely motion and statutory costs in an amount to be determined after filing a timely cost bill.

__________

S. James Otero

United States District Judge

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE


STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF FRESNO

I, PATRICIA RUBY, certify and declare as follows: I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to the within above entitled action; my business address is 6485 North Palm Avenue, Suite 105, Fresno, California 93704; Fax 559-478-5939.

I hereby certify that on July 21. 2014, I served the foregoing documents described as: MOSSLER'S [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT on the interested parties as follows: Mr. Ronald K. Alberts
Ms. Hilary E. Feybush
Gordon & Rees LLP
633 West Fifth Street, 52 Floor
Los Angeles, California 90071
ralberts@gordonrees.com
hfeybush@gordonrees.com
Attorneys for Defendant,
AETNA LIFE INSURANCE
COMPANY
[ X ] ELECTRONICALLY: I caused a true and correct copy thereof to be electronically filed using the Court's Electronic Court Filing ("ECF") System and service was completed by electronic means by transmittal of a Notice of Electronic Filing on the registered participants of the ECF System. I served those parties who are not registered participants of the ECF System as indicated below. [ ] I placed the [ ] original / [ ] a true copy thereof enclosed in a sealed envelope(s) to the parties listed above and caused such envelope(s) to be delivered by:

[ ] U.S. POSTAL SERVICE [ ] OVERNIGHT DELIVERY [ ] BY EMAIL: I electronically transmitted a true and correct copy thereof to the interested parties' electronic notification address(es) of record before close of business for the purpose of effecting service and the transmission was reported as complete and without error.

I am employed in the office of a member of the bar of this Court at whose direction the service was made. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the above is true and correct. Executed on July 21, 2014, at Fresno, California.

__________

PATRICIA RUBY


Summaries of

Mossler v. Aetna Life Ins. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 21, 2014
Case No. 2:13-cv-01945-SJO(MRWx) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 21, 2014)

considering the plaintiff's SSDI award because the decision constituted additional support in determining plaintiff's benefit entitlement

Summary of this case from Gallegos v. Prudential Ins. Co. of Am.

interpreting the same plan provisions similarly

Summary of this case from Kibel v. Aetna Life Insurance Co.

considering the plaintiff's SSDI award because the decision constituted additional support in determining plaintiff's benefit entitlement. (citing Schramm, 718 F.Supp.2d at 1165)

Summary of this case from Bledsoe v. Metropolitan Life Ins.
Case details for

Mossler v. Aetna Life Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:C. ROSS MOSSLER, Plaintiff, v. AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 21, 2014

Citations

Case No. 2:13-cv-01945-SJO(MRWx) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 21, 2014)

Citing Cases

Kibel v. Aetna Life Insurance Co.

Moreover, "[a]ny finding of fact that is more appropriately deemed a conclusion of law, or vice versa, is so…

Shaw v. Life Insurance Company of North America

Although the standards used by various disability benefits programs to determine eligibility vary, the fact…