From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moss v. U.S. Secret Serv.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON MEDFORD DIVISION
Sep 28, 2015
No. 1:06-cv-3045-CL (D. Or. Sep. 28, 2015)

Opinion

No. 1:06-cv-3045-CL

09-28-2015

MICHAEL MOSS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE, Department of Homeland Security, et al., Defendants.


ORDER PANNER, Judge.

Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke has filed a Report and Recommendation, and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). When either party objects to any portion of a Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation, the district court reviews that portion of the Magistrate Judge's report de novo. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F. 2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981). Here, Plaintiffs and Defendants have filed timely objections, so I have reviewed the file de novo.

I agree with the Report and Recommendation that Plaintiffs' motion for class certification should be granted as to Plaintiffs' claims for unlawful arrest and false imprisonment, and denied as to Plaintiffs' other claims.

CONCLUSION

Magistrate Judge Clarke's Report and Recommendation (#301) is adopted. Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification (#289) is granted in part and denied in part as set forth in the Report and Recommendation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 28 day of September, 2015.

/s/_________

ANN AIKEN

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Moss v. U.S. Secret Serv.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON MEDFORD DIVISION
Sep 28, 2015
No. 1:06-cv-3045-CL (D. Or. Sep. 28, 2015)
Case details for

Moss v. U.S. Secret Serv.

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL MOSS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON MEDFORD DIVISION

Date published: Sep 28, 2015

Citations

No. 1:06-cv-3045-CL (D. Or. Sep. 28, 2015)

Citing Cases

Puente v. City of Phoenix

As a result, Defendants contend, the factual questions arising from their use of force are too individualized…