From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moss v. Bush

Supreme Court of Ohio
Dec 16, 2004
2004 Ohio 6794 (Ohio 2004)

Opinion

No. 2004-2055.

Decided December 16, 2004.


MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS

On Petition to Contest Elections. This cause originated in this court on the filing of an election contest petition under R.C. 3515.09. On December 14, 2004, Governor Taft, pursuant to R.C. 3515.08, made the appropriate designation to hear the election contest involving the November 2, 2004 election for Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Ohio. After reviewing the portion of the petition contesting that election, I conclude that the contest is improperly combined with another election contest in the same petition. R.C. 3515.08, et seq., requires a separate petition be filed for each contested office. Election laws are mandatory and require strict compliance. State ex rel. Steele v. Morrissey, 103 Ohio St.3d 355, 2004-Ohio-4960, 815 N.E.2d 1107, ¶ 33. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that the portion of the petition contesting the November 2, 2004 election for Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Ohio be, and hereby is, dismissed without prejudice.

O'CONNOR, J., in Chambers.


Summaries of

Moss v. Bush

Supreme Court of Ohio
Dec 16, 2004
2004 Ohio 6794 (Ohio 2004)
Case details for

Moss v. Bush

Case Details

Full title:Moss v. Bush

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Dec 16, 2004

Citations

2004 Ohio 6794 (Ohio 2004)
104 Ohio St. 3d 1429
819 N.E.2d 711

Citing Cases

Moss v. Bush

{¶ 3} On December 16, 2004, Justice Maureen O'Connor and I, by separate entries, dismissed contestors'…

Crane v. Bd. of Elections

{¶ 26} "Election laws are mandatory and require strict compliance." Moss v. Bush, 104 Ohio St.3d 1429,…