From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moses v. American Red Cross Carolinas Region Blood Services

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Oct 21, 2013
542 F. App'x 295 (4th Cir. 2013)

Opinion

No. 13-1842

2013-10-21

MADELINE LEIGH MOSES, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. AMERICAN RED CROSS CAROLINAS REGION BLOOD SERVICES (ARC); PEGGY HUFFMAN; LASHION DARDEN; ERIC HINSON; DELORES SMALLS; JOYCE BRENDEL, Defendants - Appellees.

Madeline Leigh Moses, Appellant Pro Se. Brian Lee Church, Angelique Regail Vincent, ROBINSON BRADSHAW & HINSON, PA, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (7:12-cv-00306-BO) Before AGEE, DAVIS, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Madeline Leigh Moses, Appellant Pro Se. Brian Lee Church, Angelique Regail Vincent, ROBINSON BRADSHAW & HINSON, PA, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Madeline Leigh Moses appeals the district court's order dismissing her civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Moses v. Am. Red Cross Carolinas Region Blood Servs., No. 7:12-cv-00306-BO (E.D.N.C. June 14, 2013). We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Moses v. American Red Cross Carolinas Region Blood Services

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Oct 21, 2013
542 F. App'x 295 (4th Cir. 2013)
Case details for

Moses v. American Red Cross Carolinas Region Blood Services

Case Details

Full title:MADELINE LEIGH MOSES, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. AMERICAN RED CROSS…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Oct 21, 2013

Citations

542 F. App'x 295 (4th Cir. 2013)

Citing Cases

Di Wang v. Wow Brows

ndants' conduct, plaintiffs state sufficient facts to show ‘severe emotional distress' under North Carolina…