In Carter v. Moses, 40 Ill. 55, the appellee asked leave to assign cross-errors, but the court said that in a chancery case an appeal brought the whole case before the court and it would be considered upon its merits without the assignment of cross-errors.
Summary of this case from McNulty v. Hotel Sherman Co.No. CR-07-1662.
February 20, 2009.
Decisions of The Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals Without Published Opinions Affirmed.
In Carter v. Moses, 40 Ill. 55, the appellee asked leave to assign cross-errors, but the court said that in a chancery case an appeal brought the whole case before the court and it would be considered upon its merits without the assignment of cross-errors.
Summary of this case from McNulty v. Hotel Sherman Co.In Carter v. Moses, 40 Ill. 55, the appellee asked leave to assign cross-errors, but the court said that in a chancery case an appeal brought the whole case before the court and it would be considered upon its merits without the assignment of cross-errors.
Summary of this case from Knox v. MaherFull title:Moses Carter v. State
Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
Date published: Feb 20, 2009
In Illinois it is settled that a party making application to a court of equity for affirmative relief against…
McNulty v. Hotel Sherman Co.( Smith v. Sackett, 15 Ill. 528.) In Carter v. Moses, 40 Ill. 55, the appellee asked leave to assign…