From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mosehauer v. Jenkins

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 20, 1908
128 App. Div. 825 (N.Y. App. Div. 1908)

Opinion

November 20, 1908.

Frederick Miller, for the appellant.

Franklin Taylor, for the respondent Ewell.


The case was tried in the Municipal Court on February 21, 1908, and decision reserved, but judgment was not rendered until March 23, 1908, more than fourteen days. (Mun. Ct. Act [Laws of 1902, chap. 580], § 230.) There was no stipulation to extend the time for rendering judgment. Such are the circumstances as they appear in the return of the justice, which is controlling upon us. ( Stern v. Fleck, 102 App. Div. 272.) The case is deemed submitted and the fourteen days commences to run on the day of the trial, when it is announced by the justice at its conclusion, "Decision reserved." ( City Button Works v. Cohn, 52 Misc Rep. 112.) The justice, therefore, had lost jurisdiction to render judgment, which must be reversed and a new trial ordered, costs to abide the event.

WOODWARD, GAYNOR, RICH and MILLER, JJ., concurred.

Judgment of the Municipal Court reversed and new trial ordered, costs to abide the event.


Summaries of

Mosehauer v. Jenkins

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 20, 1908
128 App. Div. 825 (N.Y. App. Div. 1908)
Case details for

Mosehauer v. Jenkins

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD MOSEHAUER, Appellant, v . EDWARD T. JENKINS and RAINE EWELL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 20, 1908

Citations

128 App. Div. 825 (N.Y. App. Div. 1908)
112 N.Y.S. 1038

Citing Cases

McCarthy v. Employers' Fire Ins. Co.

On the first question presented for our consideration, it is [1] true that on November 25, 1931, it was…

American Railway Express Company v. Eddy

Since amd. by Laws of 1927, chap. 575, § 230. — [REP. The justice had lost jurisdiction but the court had…