From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mortimer v. McCool

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
Jun 22, 2020
236 A.3d 1043 (Pa. 2020)

Opinion

No. 19 MAL 2020 No. 20 MAL 2020

06-22-2020

Ryan Fell MORTIMER, Petitioner v. Michael Andrew MCCOOL, Raymond Christian McCool, Estate of Raymond R. McCool and McCool Properties, LLC, Respondents Ryan Fell Mortimer, Petitioner v. 340 Associates, LLC And McCool Properties, LLC, Respondents


ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 22nd day of June, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

Whether, in this matter of first impression, the Supreme Court should adopt the "enterprise theory" or "single entity" theory of piercing the corporate veil to prevent injustice when two or more sister companies operate as a single corporate combine?


Summaries of

Mortimer v. McCool

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
Jun 22, 2020
236 A.3d 1043 (Pa. 2020)
Case details for

Mortimer v. McCool

Case Details

Full title:RYAN FELL MORTIMER, Petitioner v. MICHAEL ANDREW MCCOOL, RAYMOND CHRISTIAN…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

Date published: Jun 22, 2020

Citations

236 A.3d 1043 (Pa. 2020)

Citing Cases

Seven Springs Mountain Resort, Inc. v. Hess

However, on June 22, 2020, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court granted Mortimer's Petition for Allowance of…