From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mortellaro v. Fellner

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Apr 13, 1973
276 So. 2d 74 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1973)

Opinion

No. 72-626.

April 13, 1973.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Pinellas County, Ben Overton, J.

Hammond Holman, Pinellas Park, for appellant.

Harold Soehl, St. Petersburg, and Laurence I. Goodrich, Tampa, for appellees.


Appellant appeals an order of the circuit court sustaining the grant of a height restriction variance by the Board of Adjustment of the Town of North Redington Beach, Florida.

The board's determination comes to the courts with a presumption of correctness and the courts will not substitute its judgment for that of the board. Troup v. Bird, Fla. 1951, 53 So.2d 717.

We have carefully examined the record on appeal and conclude that the appellant has not overcome this presumption and the court will not substitute its judgment for that of the board. Accordingly, the order appealed is affirmed.

Affirmed.

HOBSON, Acting C.J., and McNULTY, J., and PIERCE, J., (Ret.), concur.


Summaries of

Mortellaro v. Fellner

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Apr 13, 1973
276 So. 2d 74 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1973)
Case details for

Mortellaro v. Fellner

Case Details

Full title:VINCENT J. MORTELLARO, APPELLANT, v. AL E. FELLNER, ETC., ET AL., APPELLEES

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Apr 13, 1973

Citations

276 So. 2d 74 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1973)

Citing Cases

Rinker Materials v. Citizens Prop

Upon due consideration of the briefs and record on appeal we are of the opinion that the order of the trial…