Summary
invalidating a patented method for targeting online advertisements based on culled user information, and creating a corresponding bidding system for advertisers
Summary of this case from Brightedge Techs., Inc. v. Searchmetrics, GMBH.Opinion
2015-1336
11-13-2015
STEVE MORSA, Plaintiff-Appellant v. FACEBOOK, INC., Defendant-Appellee
JEFFREY BRAGALONE, Bragalone Conroy PC, Dallas, TX, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by PATRICK J. CONROY, DANIEL FLETCHER OLEJKO; MATTHEW DELGIORNO, DelGiorno IP Law, PLLC, Allen, TX. HEIDI LYN KEEFE, Cooley LLP, Palo Alto, CA, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by ELIZABETH L. STAMESHKIN, MARK R. WEINSTEIN; PHILLIP EDWARD MORTON, Washington, DC.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California in No. 8:14-cv-00161-JLS-JPR, Judge Josephine L. Staton.
JUDGMENT
JEFFREY BRAGALONE, Bragalone Conroy PC, Dallas, TX, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by PATRICK J. CONROY, DANIEL FLETCHER OLEJKO; MATTHEW DELGIORNO, DelGiorno IP Law, PLLC, Allen, TX. HEIDI LYN KEEFE, Cooley LLP, Palo Alto, CA, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by ELIZABETH L. STAMESHKIN, MARK R. WEINSTEIN; PHILLIP EDWARD MORTON, Washington, DC. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, DYK, and O'MALLEY, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT November 13, 2015
Date
/s/ Daniel E. O'Toole
Daniel E. O'Toole
Clerk of Court