In Morris v. Strobel Wilken Co., 30 N.Y. Supp. 571, 81 Hun, 1, the court's ruling is thus stated: "The mere falling of a signboard from defendant's building into the street is evidence of negligence, the maxim, res ipsa loquitur, being applicable in such case.
Summary of this case from Bauhofer v. CrawfordFebruary, 1924.
Present — Clarke, P.J., Smith, Merrell, Finch and Martin, JJ.
Judgment and orders affirmed, with costs. No opinion.
In Morris v. Strobel Wilken Co., 30 N.Y. Supp. 571, 81 Hun, 1, the court's ruling is thus stated: "The mere falling of a signboard from defendant's building into the street is evidence of negligence, the maxim, res ipsa loquitur, being applicable in such case.
Summary of this case from Bauhofer v. CrawfordFull title:CHARLES E. MORRIS, as Receiver, etc., of W. BOLUS CO. (LTD.), INC.…
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Date published: Feb 1, 1924
Chambers v. American Tin Plate Co., 129 F. 561, 64 C.C.A. 129; Atlas Powder Co. v. Benson (C.C.A.) 287 F.…
Bauhofer v. CrawfordWe therefore think that this is a case for the application of the rule res ipsa loquitur, and also of the…