From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Morris v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
May 5, 1988
524 So. 2d 494 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

Opinion

No. 87-1034.

May 5, 1988.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Seminole County; O.H. Eaton, Jr., Judge.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Barbara L. Condon, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Richard B. Martell, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.


Appellant, Christopher Ray Morris, challenges the imposition of $225 in costs pursuant to sections 27.3455(1), 960.20 and 943.25, Florida Statutes (1985).

Pursuant to the recent Florida Supreme Court cases of Harriel v. State, 520 So.2d 271 (Fla. 1988), and Mays v. State, 519 So.2d 618 (Fla. 1988), we quash the imposition of costs below and remand for assessment of costs after notice and hearing in accordance with Harriel and Mays.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

SHARP, C.J., and DAUKSCH and COBB, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Morris v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
May 5, 1988
524 So. 2d 494 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)
Case details for

Morris v. State

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER RAY MORRIS, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: May 5, 1988

Citations

524 So. 2d 494 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

Citing Cases

White v. State

On remand, after proper notice and hearing, the trial court may reconsider the imposition of costs. Lester v.…

Scott v. State

Accordingly, we quash the imposition of costs and remand the cause for reassessment of costs after proper…